|
|
|
Kofi Annan, Secretary-General of the United Nations In times of conflict, the media's responsibilities for independent and pluralistic reporting are more important than ever. They can help to prevent the worst atrocities. But when belligerents see freedom of expression as an enemy to their cause and the media as a tool for propaganda, journalists who attempt to report in a non-partisan way face pressure, manipulation, intimidation, or even elimination. And when they are forced to leave, the cycle of violence does not end. The only remaining eye-witnesses - aid workers and local residents - often become the next targets. In the aftermath of war, the establishment of a free and independent press offers a way out of mistrust and fear, into an environment where true dialogue is possible because people can think for themselves and base their opinions on facts. Wherever their independence or security is threatened - whether in repressive societies, in times of conflict or in post-conflict situations - local journalists must be supported and protected in their efforts to maintain a flow of fair and independent information. The international media, too, have an important role to play, in providing non-partisan coverage of conflicts and in calling the world's attention to humanitarian crises, human rights abuses and other situations where oblivion would be the worst of fates for suffering human beings. The international community must keep on seeking to remedy severe violations of press freedom. On behalf of our organisations, and in the interest of knowledge, justice, and peace, we promise to explore every approach that offers hope of enabling the media to carry out their invaluable and often dangerous work. Knut Vollebaek, OSCE Chairman-in-Office 1999: Freimut Duve, OSCE-Representative on Freedom of the Media: Since the beginning of the 1990s, conflicts have developed in a completely different way, without any counting up of tanks and missiles: organized hatred between ethnic groups, and so-called "ethnic conflicts", often instrumentalized by the media, have led to military confrontation. The media have played a particular role as instruments for such hatred - and also, in the case of independent, professional media, for example in Sarajevo, in resistance to it. After many decades of dictatorship, the freedom of the media has had and will continue to have a key function to perform in the process of peaceful democratization. Reconstruction and humanitarian and economic aid will be necessary and will be offered. However, contemplation on the truth and the search for reality will be key elements of civil peace. After the war, everybody must escape from the media trap, and democracies must find out how they can help avoid this trap the next time there is a conflict. Mihaylo Milovanovitch, Office of the OSCE-Representative on Freedom of the Media: There are no more bombs falling in Kosovo anymore. There are no more refugee camps. There is no more fighting. The war is over and the province liberated. But the war in Kosovo was also a Balkan war. It was a war of the heart, a war for freedom from the others and not with them. It was a war making the past more powerful then it should be, a war that crucified the people to the poin of the memories, to the tombstones of their relatives. And this war still lasts. As long as there are people killed for what they are, for speaking the way they speak, thinking the way they think, the war still lasts. Because there is a much higher freedom then the one guaranteed by institutions - it is the freedom to feel the way you are, the freedom to express yourself. It is liberation from the fear of the past and the hate of the present. Carlos Westendorp, former foreign minister of Spain, UN High
Representative for Bosnia-Hercegovina:
|
|